Paper

The Shape of Testimony: A Scalable Framework for Oral History Archive Comparison

Unreadunread

AI summary

arXiv:2605. 21623v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Researchers in Holocaust studies have often distinguished between two styles of oral survivor testimony: the USC Shoah Foundation's interviews tend to follow a structured, interviewer-guided format, whereas the Yale Fortunoff Video Archive generally favors a more free-form, open-ended style.

Reading status

Priority

About this paper

Authors: Itamar Trainin, Renana Keydar, Amit Pinchevski
Released: 2026-05-23 (2mo ago)
Topic: Related to current project
Relation to my work: Read next because The Shape of Testimony: A Scalable Framework for Oral History Archive Comparison overlaps with clean result "The marker is a representational handle, not a behavioural one — sharing it between a villain persona and the assistant transfers no misalignment (HIGH confidence)", experiment "#351 follow-up: broader-vocab position-0 sweep at T=1.0 + position-1 suffix isolation", experiment "Test FR↔IT bystander-spill symmetry at multi-seed + 5 phrasings — pooled-rate vs per-phrasing asymmetry from #239 fact-check". Matching terms: rate, test, language, model. Source: arxiv cs.AI (Artificial Intelligence).
arXiv: 2605.21623

Ask Claude about this paper

Posts a comment with @claude so the runner spins up a Claude Code session scoped to The Shape of Testimony: A Scalable Framework for Oral History Archive Comparison. Replies appear in the conversation below.

Comments

No comments yet.

Related records

No links yet.